Continuous coverage, prioritised by real risk
Most posture tools generate mountains of findings without knowing whether the affected resource is internet-reachable or isolated. The result is alert fatigue, not risk reduction. Skyreach Orion scores findings against your actual network exposure profile so you can act on what matters first.
- Continuous sync: no scan windows to wait for
- Mapped to CIS, NIST, and other frameworks
- Exposure-weighted priority, not flat severity scores
- Unified view across all cloud providers
The problem organisations face
Security posture tools generate findings. Most organisations struggle not with finding issues, but knowing which ones to fix first.
Alert fatigue from thousands of low-context findings
Most CSPM tools score findings against benchmarks without knowing whether the affected resource is internet-reachable or isolated. Thousands of alerts, no actionable priority.
Infrastructure changes faster than posture checks run
Scheduled scans miss configuration drift. A misconfiguration introduced by an auto-scaling event can sit undetected for days.
Cross-cloud posture has no single owner
AWS, Azure, and GCP each have their own security tooling. A consistent posture view requires manual aggregation that nobody does consistently.
Compliance frameworks don't map to actual risk
A "critical" CIS finding on an air-gapped system is less urgent than a "low" finding on an internet-facing payment service.
What you get
Continuous posture monitoring
No scan windows. Skyreach Orion detects configuration drift as it happens.
Framework alignment
Findings mapped to CIS, NIST, and other frameworks with clear control references for audit teams.
Exposure-weighted prioritisation
A misconfiguration on an internet-facing resource ranks higher than the same finding on an isolated internal VM.
Cross-cloud unified view
A single posture dashboard across all providers, no context-switching between native cloud security centres.